- Online Bin Covering: Expectations vs. Guarantees.
- Marie G. Christ, Lene M. Favrholdt, and Kim S. Larsen.
In 7th Annual International Conference on Combinatorial Optimization and Applications (COCOA), volume 8287 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 226-237. Springer, 2013.
Bin covering is a dual version of classic bin packing. As usual, bins have size one and items with sizes between zero and one must be packed. However, in bin covering, the objective is to cover as many bins as possible, where a bin is covered if the sizes of items placed in the bin sum up to at least one. We are considering the online version of bin covering. Two classic algorithms for online bin packing that have natural dual versions are Harmonic and Next-Fit. Though these two algorithms are quite different in nature, competitive analysis does not distinguish these bin covering algorithms.
In order to understand the combinatorial structure of the algorithms better, we turn to other performance measures, namely relative worst order, random order, and max/max analysis, as well as analyses under restricted input assumptions or uniformly distributed input. In this way, our study also supplements the ongoing systematic studies of the relative strengths of various performance measures.
We make the case that when guarantees are needed, even under restricted input sequences, the dual Harmonic algorithm is preferable. In addition, we establish quite robust theoretical results showing that if items come from a uniform distribution or even if just the ordering of items is uniformly random, then dual Next-Fit is the right choice.
- Link to the publication at the publisher's site - subscription may be required.
Text required by the publisher (if any):
The final publication is available at link.springer.com.
Link to the journal version containing all the material and proofs, some of which are usually omitted in the conference version due to space constraints.
open access (180 KB)
The same as the publisher's version, when the publisher permits. Otherwise, the author's last version before the publisher's copyright; this is often exactly the same, but sometimes fonts, page numbers, figure numbers, etc. are different. It may also be a full version. However, it is safe to read this version, and at the same time cite the official version, as long as references to concrete locations, numbered theorems, etc. inside the article are avoided.
Other publications by the author.